Why People Find it Hard to Accept the Synergy of Briton and Germanic in English Identity

The history of the English people is a rich tapestry woven from a variety of cultural and ethnic threads. Yet, despite the clear historical evidence, many people find it difficult to accept that the English identity is a synergy of Briton (Celtic) and Germanic (Anglo-Saxon, and not only) elements. This reluctance stems from a complex interplay of historical, cultural, and psychological factors. I’d like to delve into these reasons to understand why this acceptance remains elusive for many.
The formation of national identity often relies on simplified and sometimes mythologized historical narratives. For England, the dominant narrative has traditionally emphasized the Anglo-Saxon and later Norman contributions, often overshadowing the earlier Celtic (Briton) presence. The story of a unified Anglo-Saxon identity was particularly popularized in the 19th century during the rise of nationalism. This period saw a deliberate emphasis on the notion of a homogeneous English race, partly in response to the political climate and the need to forge a strong national identity.
This historical narrative is deeply ingrained and serves as a foundation for the collective consciousness of the English people. Accepting a more complex heritage requires challenging these long-held beliefs and re-examining the nation’s history, which can be an uncomfortable process for many.
Cultural integration and assimilation further complicate the acceptance of a Briton-Germanic synergy. Over centuries, the English language and culture have absorbed and integrated various influences, creating a unique identity that often obscures its diverse roots. The early Britons and later Anglo-Saxons, along with Viking and Norman influences, all contributed to this cultural mosaic. However, the dominant culture tends to highlight specific elements while minimizing others.
The process of assimilation means that many cultural contributions from the Britons and Germanic tribes have become so blended that their distinct origins are no longer easily identifiable. This blending creates an illusion of a singular, unified cultural origin, making it harder for people to recognize and accept the true diversity of their heritage. Consider that so far I hven’t mentioned the Danish/Viking contribution. I’ve never tested my DNA, but there’s certainly Danish in there, after all, I’m from Lincolnshire.
From a psychological perspective, group identity plays a crucial role in how people perceive their heritage. The concept of "in-group" and "out-group" is fundamental to social identity theory. People derive a sense of pride and self-esteem from their group affiliations, and this often involves viewing their group as distinct and superior. Far be it from me! Admitting a mixed heritage challenges the perceived purity and superiority of the in-group, leading to cognitive dissonance. This psychological discomfort can make it difficult for people to reconcile their beliefs with historical facts, resulting in resistance to accepting a synergy of Briton and Germanic origins.
Education and media significantly shape public perceptions of history and identity. The way history is taught in schools and portrayed in th media can reinforce certain narratives while neglecting others. In many cases, the focus has been on the achievements and culture of the Anglo-Saxons and Normans, with less emphasis on the Britons and the Danes.
This selective emphasis influences how people understand their heritage. When the contributions of the Britons are not highlighted or are portrayed as less significant, it reinforces the notion of a predominantly Germanic origin. Changing this perception requires a concerted effort to present a more balanced and inclusive view of history.
In contemporary society, there is a growing recognition of the importance of diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds in shaping national identities. This shift is partly driven by increased awareness of multiculturalism and a more inclusive approach to history. However, it takes time for these changes to permeate deeply entrenched beliefs and narratives. The axe I wish to grind is that in Wke culture, Anglo-Saxon is becoming a derided term because of its misuse by extreme right-wing groups. Please let us reflect on the tenth-century Renaissance under King Alfred and regard Anglo-Saxon culture with justified pride. 
As more research and scholarship highlight the contributions of both Britons and Germanic tribes to English identity, and as educational curricula and media representations evolve, it is likely that acceptance of this synergy will become more widespread. Embracing a more complex and nuanced understanding of heritage can enrich the sense of identity and foster greater appreciation for the diverse roots of the English people.
The reluctance to accept the synergy of Briton and Germanic in English identity is rooted in historical narratives, cultural integration, psychological factors, and the influence of education and the media. Challenging these entrenched views requires a willingness to re-examine history and embrace a more inclusive understanding of identity. As society progresses, there is hope that this acceptance will grow, leading to a richer and more comprehensive appreciation of what it means to be English.
 

Thanks for commenting G. Miki - I replied by message.